A separate integration for every network
Addresses, fees, confirmations and event formats differ. Businesses have to account for each network’s specifics.
CRYPTO INFRASTRUCTURE FOR BUSINESS
One API for payments, wallets, payouts and conversion. Built-in AML checks and risk management are part of the future platform.
I’m seeking a business co-founder to build a company together: I’ll handle architecture and development; my partner will take on initial funding, the first customers and business development.
Project stage: concept and partner search
Stores · SaaS · Digital services
Payments · Wallets · Payouts
AML · Risk policies · Network adapters
A concept for a future platform with AML protection. The commercial product has not been developed yet.
THE PROBLEM WE START WITH
We plan to bring business payment workflows and risk controls together — from invoicing a customer to paying a partner.
Addresses, fees, confirmations and event formats differ. Businesses have to account for each network’s specifics.
Payment acceptance, wallets, payouts and conversion need consistent accounting and clear statuses.
Links to fraud, hacks and sanctioned addresses can lead to investigations, freezes and losses.
Repeated requests, underpayments, external API failures and inconsistent data require processing rules and an audit trail.
PRODUCT VISION
Payment acceptance, wallet management, mass payouts, conversion and AML protection in one platform.
EXAMPLE: AN ONLINE STORE AND USDT
The platform brings together crypto acceptance, risk checks, operation accounting and automated settlements.
Conceptual scenario · $500 invoice
The store creates a $500 invoice through the API. The platform generates payment details and returns a payment link or QR code.
The customer sends USDT on the selected supported network.
Blockchain Monitor detects the incoming transfer and tracks network confirmations.
Analysis of available transaction and related address data produces a risk assessment.
Acceptable risk and the required confirmations may allow the merchant’s internal balance to be credited. Suspicious operations go to additional review.
The store receives a webhook with the payment processing result.
Keep accounting in the original asset, convert it, prepare a payout or transfer to an agreed address — depending on the architecture and available integrations.
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY
For companies interested in crypto payments, integrating networks, managing wallets, controlling risks and organising payouts on their own makes adoption harder. The future platform should bring these processes together. We’ll validate demand and the priority segment together.
Online stores accepting cryptocurrency from customers.
Online services, subscriptions and digital products.
Companies that need crypto infrastructure through an API.
Platforms that need mass payouts, operation accounting and risk controls.
PLANNED CAPABILITIES
These capabilities describe our vision for the future platform. MVP priorities will be set after validating demand and regulatory requirements.
A fast, stable and convenient interface for core business operations is a goal of the future architecture.
One integration for working with multiple cryptocurrencies and blockchain networks.
Supported networks and assets have not been decided. This preliminary list is not a promise to support every cryptocurrency.
AML Protection helps assess source-of-funds risks. Protecting keys and access is the responsibility of the separate Wallet Security capability.
AML does not guarantee the absence of risky incoming funds or prevent wallet hacks. Internal crediting decisions depend on the architecture.
Wallet Security protects asset management infrastructure: keys, access and transaction execution.
Key storage and signing mechanisms will be determined after choosing a custody model.
Unified infrastructure for addresses, balances and outgoing operations with access controls.
The custody model has not been chosen. Holding customer assets depends on the legal and technical model.
Payment workflows for online stores, SaaS and digital services.
Automating payouts to partners and contractors while keeping each operation under control.
An uncertain submission outcome requires blockchain reconciliation, not blindly resending a transfer.
Payment in one asset and valuation in another through partner integrations selected after research.
The availability and terms of automatic conversion will be determined after researching liquidity, legislation and partner integrations.
One interface for incoming payments, outgoing payouts and operational control.
Programmable payments between SaaS services, API platforms, AI agents and business systems.
A future development direction, not a mandatory feature of the initial MVP.
PRINCIPLES OF THE FUTURE PLATFORM
Four principles for building the product and validating its value for businesses.
One API instead of separate integrations with each blockchain network.
A unified programming interface for different blockchains and financial operations.
Built-in AML checks, risk policies and controls for critical operations.
Risk controls are built into the payment lifecycle. Key and access protection is handled separately from assessing the source of funds.
We plan to connect payments, payouts, wallets and notifications in automated workflows with manual review of exceptions.
Idempotency, queues, reconciliation, partial failure handling and recovery after errors.
A platform integrated into existing business processes, not just a payment form.
Adding networks and payment workflows without redesigning the whole system is an architectural goal.
EXPERIENCE YOU CAN EXPLORE
16+ years of commercial development and four public architecture projects: payment accounting, wallets, blockchain operations and business automation.
The technical side of this project does not start from scratch. There is already experience in designing financial accounting, managing blockchain wallets, processing transactions and building fault-tolerant integrations.
A P2P platform architecture case study: financial states, internal accounting and a dedicated TON / Jetton operations service.
For the payment core and payouts: reserving funds, preventing duplicate credits, reconciling and recovering operations.
Architecture for managing Solana wallets and SOL / SPL transfers: from financial intent to network confirmation.
For wallet management and payouts: controlled signing, handling uncertain RPC responses and confirming outcomes against blockchain data.
TON / Jetton infrastructure architecture: custody, asset accounting, DEX operations, deposit events and recovery.
For blockchain adapters and conversion research: operation lifecycles, quote controls and reliable event delivery. The new product’s custody model has not been chosen yet.
An architecture case study of a book commerce platform: inventory, catalogue, orders and marketplace synchronisation.
For the merchant dashboard and integrations: background processes, external API limits, partial failure handling and operational reconciliation.
TECHNICAL CO-FOUNDER
Backend developer · Systems architect
I’m ready to take responsibility for technical architecture, MVP development and the product’s evolution — from the data model to reliable integrations.
Client reviewsArchitecture, code, technical security and development management. We’ll validate business hypotheses and product priorities together.
TWO ROLES. ONE COMPANY.
The technical founder and architecture expertise are already in place. I’m looking for a partner with the experience, resources and willingness to own the commercial side: validating the hypothesis and launching a company together.
I’m looking for neither a development client nor a passive investor, but a partner ready to build a company together, share responsibility and participate in strategic decisions.
Equity, financial commitments and legal terms are discussed individually.
THE FIRST 90 DAYS TOGETHER
I’m not proposing an immediate investment in building a large platform. First, we’ll validate demand, economics and legal feasibility.
Days 1–30
Business hypotheses provisionally supported or disproved.
Days 31–60
An assessment of commercial and legal feasibility.
Days 61–90
An agreed delivery plan or a reasoned decision not to pursue the project.
90 days is a guideline for testing the hypothesis, not a guaranteed timeline. This is not a promise to deliver a working crypto processor in 90 days.
If the decision is positive: MVP development, then a pilot with a limited number of business customers once legal and technical requirements are met. Further features and scaling depend on confirmed demand.
BUSINESS HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis: businesses will pay for one API, automated payments and payouts, centralised accounting and tools to assess the source of funds. We’ll test which workflows are in demand and justify the infrastructure cost.
No monetisation model has been chosen. Each option requires validation of demand, costs and regulatory constraints. Pricing, profitability and volume projections have not been defined.
TRANSPARENT STATUS
Technical experience and a preliminary concept are in place. The next step is finding a partner and validating the business hypothesis.
| Area | Status |
|---|---|
| Product concept | Preliminary concept defined |
| Technical experience | Available |
| Public architecture projects | Available |
| Business model | Needs validation |
| Legal model | Not defined |
| Commercial MVP | Not developed |
| Business co-founder | Seeking a partner |
LET’S START A CONVERSATION
If you have experience growing a technology business, understand financial products and are ready to take responsibility for the commercial side, let’s discuss launching this project together.
Message on Telegram@ifwcom
Tell me about your experience, interest in the project and the role you’re ready to take on.
A few words about you and your potential contribution.