AI Sales Agent + CRM
Evidence-first architecture for deal context, correspondence, AI output validation and controlled CRM actions.
Explore the reference →MCP · AI · CRM · API
Connect ChatGPT, Claude and AI agents to your CRM, databases, APIs and internal services. I build secure MCP integrations around the workflows your business actually needs.
Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open protocol that connects AI applications to external tools and data sources. It provides a shared connection interface; your integration still defines business rules and permissions.
MCP server development is the creation of a software interface that gives compatible AI applications controlled access to the tools, data and functions of external systems.
An AI assistant can answer questions, but cannot access your private CRM without a separate connection. People have to find and copy the context themselves.
A compatible AI client can call approved tools to find customers, review deals, retrieve orders and prepare reports. Write access is enabled only for agreed workflows.
Access is restricted by user permissions, security policies and server configuration. MCP does not bypass authorisation or give an AI agent unrestricted control of your business.
Integrations use available official APIs and agreed interfaces. Discovery checks permissions, subscriptions, rate limits and support for each required operation.
amoCRM, Bitrix24 and custom platforms: customers, deals, tasks and interaction history.
Orders, inventory, finance and production workflows within the scope of your system’s API and permissions.
PostgreSQL, MySQL and other databases through restricted views and parameterised queries.
REST, GraphQL and internal services with input validation and controlled network access.
Search company documentation and knowledge bases while respecting source permissions.
Telegram, WhatsApp and other platforms, limited to operations available through their official APIs.
Find messages, summarise conversations and draft replies through authorised mail interfaces.
Products, orders, stock and analytics with permissions scoped by store, role and action.
Start with an outcome that helps an employee, then define narrowly scoped tools. Reading data and changing it have separate permissions and controls.
An agent reviews deal stages, tasks and correspondence to identify stalled opportunities.
A manager requests a summary for agreed metrics and a specific reporting period.
An employee finds the relevant policy and the sources supporting the answer.
A sales representative receives a summary of orders, conversations and commitments.
The agent prepares a task. Creation happens after human approval and a server-side permission check.
An agent analyses product availability, order trends and potential discrepancies.
An agent calls agreed service operations; actions with side effects go through explicit controls.
A person reviews and approves proposed changes, then the server checks the current record before writing.
The MCP client runs inside the AI application. The server exposes tools and enforces access checks before reaching business systems. This diagram shows logical boundaries, not a requirement to deploy every step as a separate service.
Focused operations such as finding a customer, fetching an order or preparing a task, with clear input and output schemas.
Addressable data and documents with access policies. Availability depends on the AI client.
Reusable prompt templates where supported by the client. They do not replace server-side checks.
HTTPS, scoped tokens, audit trails, timeouts and rate limits. Streamable HTTP for remote access; stdio where a local process is appropriate.
MCP does not automatically make an integration secure. Protection comes from the architecture, correct authorisation, business rules and server-side validation of every call.
OAuth 2.1 for applicable HTTP integrations, token validation and object-level permissions. Other environments use a mechanism selected for the threat model.
Read-only access wherever writing is unnecessary; separate roles, tools and service accounts for different workflows.
A restricted integration layer protects internal services. Secrets stay on the server. Arbitrary URLs, SQL and shell commands are not passed through for execution.
Record the actor, operation and outcome with sensitive values masked. Bound call frequency, runtime and data volume.
Sensitive actions require approval. The server rechecks permissions, parameters and record state before writing and accounts for retries.
Treat email and document content as untrusted data. It cannot grant a tool extra privileges. Validate arguments and outputs, and test adversarial workflows.
These references demonstrate AI, CRM and RAG architecture. They are not presented as completed commercial MCP deployments.
Evidence-first architecture for deal context, correspondence, AI output validation and controlled CRM actions.
Explore the reference →AI-native scheduling and CRM architecture with knowledge retrieval and workflow automation.
Explore the reference →Public architecture and code examples: LLM classification, Qdrant, quality checks and controlled publishing.
Explore the reference →A public product for discovering and evaluating software projects, showing data processing and product engineering.
Explore the reference →Check documentation, supported operations, constraints and data sources.
Agree on users, workflows, useful outcomes and acceptance criteria.
Define contracts, parameter schemas, read/write boundaries and access policies.
Implement adapters, explicit errors, timeouts and safe retries.
Set up roles, tokens, approvals, isolation and request limits.
Verify chosen AI clients, API failures, permissions and attempts to bypass restrictions.
Prepare hosting, HTTPS, secrets, monitoring and an update procedure.
Hand over client setup, tool contracts and the support process.
Scope depends on the number of systems and tools, API quality, access controls, hosting and testing requirements.
One API or data source, a focused set of tools and a clearly defined workflow.
Pricing is provided after reviewing your requirements.
Get a project estimate →Multiple systems, authentication, role-based access, audit trails and operational limits.
Pricing is provided after reviewing your requirements.
Get a project estimate →An AI interface, tool integrations and end-to-end workflow automation with action controls.
Pricing is provided after reviewing your requirements.
Get a project estimate →I select the stack after discovery. The MCP server can run as a Node.js or Python service while business logic stays in PHP/Laravel. SDK and protocol-version support are checked for your project. Audits, optimisation and ongoing maintenance are also available for existing MCP servers.
Technical references: MCP architecture · Authorisation · Security practices · ChatGPT connections
It is a software service that exposes tools, resources or prompt templates to a compatible AI application through Model Context Protocol. The server implementation and user permissions determine access to your systems.
An API defines the operations of a specific system. MCP provides a shared way for AI clients to discover and call capabilities. An MCP server often uses existing APIs rather than replacing their business logic.
Yes, through a custom MCP server when the required API and MCP connection support are available in your ChatGPT environment. Availability depends on the mode, workspace permissions and security settings. I verify this before development.
Through an MCP server with focused read tools, restricted database views and permission checks. I verify transport and authentication support in the chosen Claude client. Unrestricted SQL access is unnecessary.
Yes, when the application or agent framework around the model includes an MCP client. The model itself does not automatically speak MCP. Tool calling, transport and result handling must be checked.
Security depends on access policies, isolation, argument validation and prompt injection defences. I use least privilege, audit trails and human approval for sensitive operations. Permitted data and residual risks are agreed before launch.
There is no single fixed price. I estimate the work after reviewing APIs, workflows and access requirements. Hosting, third-party API and LLM usage costs are considered separately.
Timing depends on API readiness, tool count, authentication and testing. Discovery produces milestones and a schedule. Unknown dependencies may require a technical feasibility check for one workflow first.
Yes. One server can expose tools for several systems, or a client can connect to multiple servers. The choice depends on access boundaries, ownership and isolation requirements.
Yes, on your VPS, in Docker or inside a private environment. Connectivity depends on the client. A remote client needs an accessible HTTPS endpoint or a supported secure channel; a local process can use stdio.
FIGHTEX: economy and tokenomics simulatorAn example of game economy modelling and scenario testing.
MCP use cases for a websiteExamples of AI working with website tools and data.
MCP and RAG for working with business dataConnecting data retrieval with tools and result presentation.
Second Brain: knowledge base and vector searchExplore the project problem, solution and limitations.
MCP / AI INTEGRATION
Tell me which systems you use and the work you want to automate. I will propose an MCP integration architecture and estimate the development scope.
@ifwcomMessage on TelegramDo not send passwords, API keys or confidential records.
Do not send passwords, API keys or confidential records.